An evidentiary hearing of the Freedom of Information Commission in the following matter was held on March 6, 2014 in the Freedom of Information Hearing Room, 18-20 Trinity Street, Hartford, Connecticut. Vallejo, CA 94589. (c) In any prosecution under this section, if evidence has been introduced tending to show the existence of any of the circumstances described in subsection (b) (1) or (b) (2), and direct evidence of the actual belief of the debtor as to the creditor's collection practices is not available, then for the purpose of showing the understanding of the debtor and the creditor at the time the extension of credit was made, the court may in its discretion allow evidence to be introduced tending to show the reputation as to collection practices of the creditor in any community of which the debtor was a member at the time of the extension. <> WebAngelo is on the list of graduates from high school. The mortgage was subsequently assigned from MERS to Taylor on January 15, 2009. Instead the Court held that " [a]s long as it is clear that the presumption is not the sole and sufficient basis for a finding of guilt", it need meet only a "more likely than not" rather than a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, and, after analyzing the precise facts and jury instructions in Allen, concluded that the New York statute passed the test as there applied. In contrast, defendants here do not contend that by a suitable statute Congress could not have made criminal the conduct which they have admitted by their guilty pleas. Spokeo's database, while extensive, does not contain all U.S. warrant, arrest, court, or other related records. In the first four cases the constitutional claims were held not to survive the guilty plea; in the last two, as in Haynes, supra, 390 U.S. 85, 88 S. Ct. 722, 19 L. Ed. Additionally, the defendant Connecticut Environmental Control, LLC, is a party to this action by virtue of a contractor's lien recorded on the Stratford land records on May 31, 2007..FN1. 1308, 1310 (1978). Sometimes Dahill goes by various nicknames including Edward Peruta appeared on his own behalf. WebDahill A Donofrio Jr Dahill A Donofrio Jr, Age 69 aka Donofrio Dahill, Dahill D Onofrio Current Address: LZDM Greystone, Shelton, CT Past Addresses: Bridgeport CT, Shelton ], Whether the publicity, the charge to the Grand Jury and other conduct of the Government described in the record below require the dismissal of the indictment. IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. This article about a West Virginia politician is a stub. denied, 425 U.S. 960, 96 S. Ct. 1742, 48 L. Ed. We found 15 phone numbers and email addresses. As the Court recognized, the doctrine that a scienter argument may save a statute which might otherwise have to be condemned for vagueness stems from the plurality opinion in Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91, 101-02, 65 S. Ct. 1031, 1035-36, 89 L. Ed. 2d 138 (1968)); McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90 S. Ct. 1441, 25 L. Ed. The Bank states in its memorandum in support of its motion for summary judgment that original or certified copies of these documents will be produced at the hearing on the motion for summary judgment.. WebTop 3 Results for Dahill Donofrio in CT 1 The best result we found for your search is Dahill A Donofrio age 60s in Shelton, CT in the Shelton neighborhood. Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. Since we have held that appellants' claims with respect to the constitutionality of 892(b) and Francis Curcio's claim with respect to the constitutionality of the Pinkerton doctrine were improperly reserved by them and have declined to answer these claims, we accede to their requests that we vacate their convictions on conditional pleas of guilty and remand to the district court with instructions to permit the pleas to be withdrawn. 2d 110] (1972), is void for vagueness. You can email the site owner to let them know you were blocked. The only difficulty apparent to us arises from the use of the verb "could" in the language of the statute. 1979) (Wisdom, J.) The court will consider the Hopkins affidavit attached to the Bank's reply memorandum in place of the original Hopkins affidavit attached to the motion for summary judgment in resolving this matter. He served in the West Virginia House of Delegates (from 195761) and in the State Senate (from 196164). Westen, Away from Waiver: A Rationale for the Forfeiture of Constitutional Rights in Criminal Procedure, 75 Mich. L. Rev. 892(b) and the Pinkerton doctrine, Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S. Ct. 1180, 90 L. Ed. 1574, 1574 n. 6 (1981), See, e.g., Hammontree v. Phelps, 605 F.2d 1371, 1373 (5 Cir. 4Whip's fourth, fifth, seventh and eighth special defenses concern lack of standing and subject matter jurisdiction. 4 Whip was served on January 20, 2009, and the defendant Connecticut Environmental, LLC, was served on January 21, 2009..FN3. The email address cannot be subscribed. Furthermore, the foreclosing party must demonstrate that all conditions precedent to foreclosure, as mandated by the note and mortgage, have been satisfied. Bank of New York v. Conway, 50 Conn.Sup. denied, 295 Conn. 922, 991 A.2d 564 (2010). Your IP: On two occasions defendants' attorneys were asked by the district court if they had "any substantial disagreement with the Government's description of the proof it could offer at trial." KUWIrpQI)M}D.0#n)fj6E It will be time enough for the Court to reconsider Pinkerton, if it desires to do so, in a case where it has a full record and application of the rule would make some substantial difference. Wilson v. New Haven, 213 Conn. 277, 279, 567 A.2d 829 (1989). The sixth special defense alleges a lack of personal jurisdiction and is again unsupported by any factual allegations. An evidentiary hearing of the Freedom of Information Commission in the following consolidated matters was held on March 5, 2014 in the Freedom of Information Hearing Room, 18-20 Trinity Street, Hartford, Connecticut. Stratford, Connecticut, United States. 365, 367, 635 A.2d 874 (1993), cert. These three cases, decided on the same day in opinions by Justice White, are often referred to as "the Brady trilogy". Each meeting will be held in the Freedom of Information Hearing Room, First Floor, 18-20 Trinity Street, Hartford, Connecticut, for the purpose of conducting a hearing concerning the contested case designated by the corresponding docket number listed below. 2d 235 (1973) (exclusion of blacks from grand jury); Blackledge v. Perry, 417 U.S. 21, 94 S. Ct. 2098, 40 L. Ed. Hand crafted, one of a kind, all leather handbags and all leather goods. The presence or absence of records for any individual is not a guarantee of any kind. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. Appellants' counsel addressed the issue in their reply brief and the matter was discussed extensively at oral argument, with the Government joining appellants in urging us to decide the issues reserved in the plea agreements. The fact that no other court has exclusive jurisdiction in any matter is sufficient to give the Superior Court jurisdiction of that matter [T]he general rule of jurisdiction is that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a Superior Court but that which specially appears to be so [N]o court is to be ousted of its jurisdiction by implication. (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Three days later, on December 6, 1982, the United States, represented by William A. Keefer, an attorney from the Department of Justice,4 signed detailed plea agreements with each of the four appellants. WebDahill Donofrio was associated with Sultan Realty Management in 2014. Its rationality would be much clearer in a case replete with evidence of defendants' use or threats of violence to effect collection than in one where there was no such evidence and the prosecution relied solely on evidence of the creditor's reputation. Hardiman and Cray would have testified to a loan from D'Onofrio at 4% interest per week; Francis Curcio discussed the loan with Cray and when Hardiman left town before repaying the debt, Gus Curcio told Cray that he was "hunting for" Hardiman. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. D'Onofrio's plea of guilty, also to Count Two, was taken on December 9. 975 Sereno Drive. May v. Coffey, 291 Conn. 106, 113, 967 A.2d 495 (2009). Angelo is a resident of 487 Commanche Lanes, Stratford, CT 06614. Thus, 4 Whip was made a party to this action due to its status as a subsequent interest holder. Presumably because his plea was to the conspiracy count, the prosecutor made no further proffer of evidence. ), In addition to the specific warnings of Allen against a "facial" approach with respect to statutory "permissive presumptions", we might well be compelled to refrain from ruling on the abstract question tendered with respect to 892(b) by the more general considerations against premature constitutional adjudication developed in Justice Brandeis' famous concurring opinion in Ashwander v. TVA, 297 U.S. 288, 341, 346-48, 56 S. Ct. 466, 480, 482-83, 80 L. Ed. Stratford, Ct, 06615. Discover work experience, company details, and more. 4 Whip was served on January 20, 2009, and the defendant Connecticut Environmental, LLC, was served on January 21, 2009. Taylor was, thus, the holder of the note, endorsed in blank, at the time the present foreclosure action was commenced, by service of process on Donofrio, on January 19, 2010.3 The authenticated copy of the assignment submitted by the Bank in support of its motion for summary judgment establishes that MERS assigned the mortgage to Taylor on January 15, 2009 and that the assignment was recorded on the Stratford land records on February 9, 2009. The complainant failed to appear. 892. FN6. On March 30, 2009, the original plaintiff, Taylor, Bean and Whitaker Mortgage Corp. (Taylor), filed an amended single-count complaint, alleging the following facts. Brutnell, a FBI Special Agent acting in an undercover capacity would have testified that he asked D'Onofrio for a loan of $5000 to $10,000, that D'Onofrio said he had to get approval for the loan and sent Brutnell to see Gus Curcio who stated that he needed Francis' approval for a loan of that size, and that Francis later told agent Brutnell he was considering whether to make the loan. See also United States v. DeStafano, 429 F.2d 344, 347 (2 Cir. These concerns were reiterated in United States v. Guerro, 694 F.2d 898, 903 (2 Cir. 1975), cert. The Freedom of Information Commission will hold special meetings during the week of March 3, 2014 through March 7, 2014 at the specific dates and times listed below. As such, the first, second and third special defenses fail to raise issues of fact so as to preclude summary judgment as to liability. The Bank argues that 4 Whip's nine special defenses are legally insufficient. 3771 and 3772 on April 28, 1983; in the absence of congressional action, it will become effective on August 1, 1983, A fifth defendant, Edward Vagnini, pleaded guilty to the conspiracy count of the indictment and was sentenced to two years imprisonment. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. The same would seem to be true with respect to appellants' claim of prejudicial publicity if this is read to be, as again we think it must, that the effect of the publicity had been such that nothing short of dismissal of the indictment would do. x}ZKw6Wxd! 4q'qO'$fGRIs_ !$~R_>/OwgseGrY9t>}V?Tjuun~|wPKl_emc>|R~Y;8zW^uyRo4U-}ixo[o5__ g%ErH-v+oR~/Zu=6}SU? FN5. regular You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. YouTube is a video-sharing website where users can upload and watch videos, subscribe to user channels and leave comments. Rather 892(b) creates a "permissive inference or presumption" namely, one "which allows--but does not require--the trier of fact to infer the elemental fact from proof by the prosecutor of the basic one and which places no burden of any kind on the defendant." The prosecutor represented that Alchimio would have testified that at the time the extensions of credit were made, he believed that physical harm would come to him if he failed to repay the loans, and that this belief was based on his awareness of Francis Curcio's reputation in the community. FN1. (emphasis in original). Their name are Joanna D'Onofrio, Richard J Donofrio, and five others. 4 court search results for people named "Dahill Donofrio" in the United States. The substitute plaintiff, the Bank of New York, as Trustee for TBW Mortgage-Backed Trust 2007-1 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-1 (the Bank), now moves for summary judgment as to liability against the defendant 4 Whip, LLC (4 Whip). 5841. Chief Judge Daly denied the motions to dismiss in an opinion filed on September 23, 1982. Specifically, the Cook and Hopkins affidavits, along with the copies of the mortgage assignments, establish a chain of title transferring the mortgage and note to the Bank. In its objection to the motion for summary judgment, 4 Whip contends that the Hopkins affidavit is legally insufficient. 2d 854 (1978); Papachristou v. Jacksonville, supra, 405 U.S. at 163, 92 S. Ct. at 843; and Boyce Motor Lines v. United States, 342 U.S. 337, 342, 72 S. Ct. 329, 331, 96 L. Ed. * Historical, vital, and court records and search results may require an additional purchase. 1877 (1947), an appeal from the dismissal of an indictment under the Criminal Appeals Act as it then stood, 18 U.S.C. The void-for-vagueness claim, read as we believe it must be, can be determined by analysis of the statute and, if appellants are right, would prevent them or anyone else from being convicted under it. It has jurisdiction of all matters expressly committed to it and of all other matters cognizable by any law court of which the exclusive jurisdiction is not given to some other court. The mortgage deed was recorded in the Stratford land records. 570, 576-77, 989 A.2d 606, cert. Professor Tribe has written, American Constitutional Law 718-19 (1978), that outside the area of First Amendment concerns, the Supreme Court will not ordinarily invalidate a statute because some marginal offenses may remain within the scope of a statute's language. Dahill has lived with Santa in a single family house in Stratford, CT. Search for birth, death, marriage, divorce, US Census, and military records. The United States represents that if the case were to proceed to trial it would be necessary to utilize both the provisions of 18 U.S.C. Viewing the available evidence in a light most favorable to 4 Whip, the Bank has established a prima facie case of mortgage foreclosure and 4 Whip's special defenses are insufficient to withstand the entry of summary judgment. Making extortionate extensions of credit. He did not take an appeal. 21(a), outside the district, in a continuance, or in both. Find more info on AllPeople about Dahill Donofrio and 732 Bishop Avenue, LLC, as well as people who work for similar businesses nearby, colleagues for other branches, and more people with a similar name. Counts may not reflect the number of records that will appear in search results. The Burns court, speaking through Chief Judge Feinberg, elaborated on our concerns, previously voiced in United States v. Lace, 669 F.2d 46 (2 Cir. Here is Dahill's phone number (203) 929-6629 (Southern New England Tel Co). Leonard A Donofrio, 66. Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. v. Dahill A. Donofrio et al. Cloudflare Ray ID: 7c0c67540c8d0a9f 2d 663 (1963), even publicity partly engendered by the Government would not warrant the extreme remedy of dismissal of an indictment before a voir dire. The statute, as construed by the Court, punished conduct which the self-incrimination clause protected; Haynes' plea simply admitted conduct in which he was constitutionally privileged to engage. Rather, the thrust of 4 Whip's objection concerns the subject matter jurisdiction of the court. Practice Book 9-16 provides: If, pending the action, the plaintiff assigns the cause of action, the assignee, upon written motion, may either be joined as a co-plaintiff or be substituted as a sole plaintiff, as the judicial authority may order; provided that it shall in no manner prejudice the defense of the action as it stood before such change of parties.. This extra-record evidence reflected that Success, Inc., had commenced the prior action shortly after the defen The first, second and third special defenses generally allege that the Bank failed to comply with the terms of the note and mortgage deed. 2d 763 (1970) (guilty plea following confession whose voluntariness state offered no constitutionally valid means of testing); Parker v. North Carolina, 397 U.S. 790, 90 S. Ct. 1458, 25 L. Ed. In fact, these questions do not require extensive consideration. The well established rule is that a summary judgment rendered upon the issue of liability only, without deciding damages, is not a final judgment from which an appeal lies. Balf Co. v. Spera Construction Co., 222 Conn. 211, 212, 608 A.2d 682 (1992). WebThere are 6 other people named Dahill Donofrio on AllPeople. Born in Glen Jean, West Virginia, Dahill served in the United States Marine Corps during World War II.